-->
  • Are P2V conversions still worth doing?

    Physical-to-virtual conversions have a few gotchas, but they may be the best option when a proper application, data, and configuration migration isn't possible.
     
    lead image
     
    A colleague recently asked me if performing a physical-to-virtual (P2V) conversion was still a valid task to do today. After all, I am the one who encourages everyone to virtualize like it's 2014! When the question was raised, I wasn’t immediately familiar with the state of the tools. The gold standard in free tools is VMware Converter Standalone, but I hadn’t used it for a good two or three years. The current version is 5.0.1, which was released in October 2012. Good thing, as anyone deploying a physical server before then would need to answer to me directly. Depending on the situation, I generally advise people to migrate applications and data to a new virtual machine compared to doing a P2V conversion. That’s the academic approach. But what is good practical advice for P2V tasks today?
    When I inquired a bit more with my colleague about the P2V candidate, the idea of migrating it to a new VM sounded like a nearly impossible task due to the lack of real ownership and knowledge of the system and applications on this system — a Small Business Server 2011 (SBS) system. SBS solved a great need for companies to have basic file, print, email, and application platforms leveraging Microsoft technologies. After a quick few minutes identifying the scope of a proper migration to a new VM from an application and data perspective, the P2V approach sounded easier and less risky.
    Still, a P2V conversion does incur risk. For one thing, it doesn’t remove any application or system configuration problems that occurred when the system was a physical server. There are plenty of potential gotchas associated with P2Vs as well. Here are some of the tips I recommend based on things that caught me over the past year. I shared them with my colleague (who successfully performed a P2V of the SBS server).

    Avoiding the gotchas

    • Identify anything tied to an interface or IP address. Exchange, IIS, and other applications are notorious for specific IP addresses or interfaces being configured for a specific task. Figure A  shows Exchange specifying a specific interface to permit outbound mail transport. While Exchange is usually a clear-cut migration application, SBS systems are not. In Figure A, the Exchange application wants to communicate to the former interface, which post-P2V is nonexistent. This option will prevent outbound mail to be sent if there are large queues of mail failing for DNS reasons.

    Figure A

    Figure A
     
  • You might also like

    No comments:

    Post a Comment